THE MAIN CHARACTERS
THE MAIN CHARACTERSPhillip Skillicorn (sometimes spelt with an “e”) was born at Kirk Michael on the Isle of Man in 1819. In 1837 he married Ellen Corkan and, accompanied by his sister Rebecca, the couple arrived in Sydney as Bounty Immigrants on board the “Clyde” in 1840. A son Thomas was born in 1847 and a daughter Ann Jane in 1850, at which time Skillicorn was working as a butcher in Windsor on the Hawkesbury River. A second son Phillip was born in 1853 after the family had moved to Sofala and, by the time he responded to the challenge of Job Manning, Skillicorn had transferred his butchering business to Bathurst. His shop was located in George Street, between Howick and Russell Streets.According to James MacAlister, Skillicorn was “amongst the brave soldiers of fortune who visited the [gold] rush” in Forbes in 1862-3 and, in May the following year, “young Mr.Skillicorn of Bathurst” (possibly son Thomas) narrowly escaped a confrontation with Ben Hall at the Bang Bang Hotel while on his way from Cowra to Lambing Flat with five racehorses. [Penzig, p.91]. By the late 1860s, Skillicorn had moved back to Sydney. “Old Chum”, in the Sydney Truth of 26 March 1916, states that he had a butchery at Brickfield Hill on the corner of Wilmot and George Streets in 1872, while The Sands Directory for 1880 lists a Philip (sic) Skillicorn, butcher, Regent Street Redfern (though this could be his son). The move to Sydney appears to have heralded also a growing problem with alcohol and a decline in his personal life. The trajectory of that decline is starkly and tragically charted in the Darlinghurst Gaol Entrance Books. From 1869 and throughout the next decade there are numerous entries recording Skillicorn's arrest and sentencing to short periods of imprisonment for drunkenness. The NSW Index To Births, Deaths & Marriages records his death in 1881 and the last entry in the Gaol Entrance Book states that he “died in Gaol Hospital 17th January”. He was within a few weeks of his 62nd birthday. His wife Ellen died in 1896 at St. Leonards and is buried in the Church of England section of the Gore Hill Cemetery. Job Manning, the man who accepted Skillicorn's challenge and laid the wager with him, was the owner and licensee of The Rose & Crown in Bathurst. This hotel, built by Manning in 1853, was also in George Street, just down from Skillicorn's butcher shop, in the block between Durham and Howick Streets. While the poem makes no comment on the settling of the bet, a number of accounts of the ride cast Manning in a less than favourable light. Duke Tritton, recounting the story as told to him by an old Bathurst-born coach driver, Dick Knight, says:
The two Bathurst historians, Greaves and Barker, both mention Manning's failure to pay up. Greaves states that this was “because Skillicorn dismounted at one end of a trough at Wentworth Falls and mounted at the other” (p.62), while Barker says it was “because Skillicorn had dismounted and led his horse over a bad place on the road” (p.194). Both go further than Dick Knight and claim that feeling ran so high against Manning in Bathurst that he was forced to leave the town. If this latter point is correct, it appears that Manning's exile was not permanent, for he held the licence for The Rose & Crown throughout the period 1853-79 (W.H. Tighe p.4) and died in Bathurst in 1880 (Index BD&M). Skillicorn's horse, Poor Man's Friend, the real hero of the story, was a brown or bay gelding that stood 14 hands and 2 inches high and had a long white star on its forehead and a Q-shaped brand near its shoulder. Bell's Life (8 Sept.1860, p.3) considered it “a remarkably game-looking wiry nag ... though rather small to carry Mr. Skillicorn's weight over such a journey.” The Bathurst Free Press (15 Sept.1860) reported that:
The Poor Man's Friend aroused considerable interest and drew a large crowd to Charles Martyn's horse and carriage 'Bazaar', 246 Pitt Street, Sydney, where it was stabled after the race. While many people thought it had finished in better shape than its owner, its marathon performance was not approved of uniformly. On the following day The Sydney Morning Herald, for example, took a very critical view. Such a race, it said, was “one which for the credit of humanity it is to be hoped will not be repeated. The cruelty which such a performance involves, in our opinion more than counterbalances any interest which it may otherwise create; and it is but sorry sport, after all, to overtax the powers of a noble horse to such an extraordinary degree.” The paper went on to compare the sportsmen of Bathurst, where the event was “treated very lightly” and “spoken of as though it were an ordinary sporting event of everyday occurrence”, with the sportsmen of the metropolis who “for the most part strongly condemned the whole thing from beginning to end.” |